Agenda and minutes

It was proposed by Councillor Winsor, seconded by Councillor Morgan and

Resolved

That Councillor Rollason be elected Chairman for the meeting.

To confirm the minutes of the last meeting

The Minutes of the meeting held on 21 August 2018 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

There were no declarations of Interest.

4.1   Introductions

The Chairman introduced the Members of the Sub Committee, Legal Adviser,

Licensing Officer, Democratic Services Officer and explained their respective

roles.

The Chairman advised that the Sub Committee would take into account the

merits of the application against the four licensing objectives: the prevention

of crime and disorder, public safety, prevention of public nuisance and the

protection of children from harm, in addition to the Home Office Guidance and

the Council’s Licensing Policy.

4.2   Procedure to be followed

The Legal Adviser referred to the procedure to be followed for the Hearing and those present wishing to make verbal submissions. There had been no requests from any other party to speak at the hearing. The procedure was as previously circulated to all interested parties with the Notice of Hearing. All parties had been sent an agenda.

4.3   The Council’s Licensing Officer’s Report

The Licensing Manager referred to the report previously circulated with the Notice of Hearing and the agenda, which contained full details of the application. The Licensing Manager referred to the current conditions, circulated with the agenda. The premises would be known as The Rust and The Wolf. Two objection representations from residents had been received on the grounds of public nuisance. One objection had been resolved with a mediated amendment by the Police. The two objectors were not in attendance at the meeting. In response to questions the Licensing Manager advised that the police had not requested CCTV and that this was only usually requested if the closing hour was after midnight and there were crime and disorder issues in the locality. Late night refreshment had not been requested because the premises would not be open passed 2300hrs.

4.4  Address by Interested Parties

4.4.1  Mr Hayles Applicant

In attendance at the meeting was Mathew Hayles, the Applicant and Designated Premises Supervisor.  He advised that he had spoken to one of the objectors. Following their discussion the objector seemed content with his application, but their representation was not formally withdrawn.  He also referred to a document of approximately 100 signatures from existing customers in support of the new licence application to enable wine to be served with dinner. The Sub Committee agreed that this be circulated at the Hearing as additional information.

In response to questions, the Applicant advised that deliveries would be within working hours only; he has had previous temporary event notices and he has not been aware of any objections; the food service would cease at 2100hrs in the external courtyard area so as not to cause a noise nuisance to neighbours; and that the former use of the premises had been kitchen cabinet makers.

The Legal Adviser confirmed that she was not aware of any noise nuisance issues in relation to the premises having been reported to the Council’s Environmental Health Department.

5.  Decision

“We have very carefully considered all the written and oral evidence and submissions from all the parties.

            The Council’s Licensing Policy states that terminal hours will normally be  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.