Venue: Virtual Meeting - Virtual Meeting. View directions
Contact: Comsec Email: comsec@teignbridge.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
To confirm the minutes of the last meeting held on 24 November. Minutes: The minutes of the previous meeting held on 24 November were signed as a correct record barring two amendments by the Chair.
A roll call was taken
For
Councillors Bullivant, Clarance, H Cox, Hayes, Nuttall, Nutley, Parker, Goodman-Bradbury, and Haines
Against
Councillor MacGregor
Abstained
Councillor Bradford, Dewhirst, Patch
|
|
20/01597/HOU Ranworth, Teignmouth PDF 486 KB Minutes: The Planning Officer introduced the application to the committee with a presentation.
Public Speaker, Supporter – Spoke on: · Loss of privacy · Overdevelopment · No roof plan
Public Speaker, Supporter – Spoke on: · Similar designs in area · Roof height increase is only moderate · Sloped ground prevents overlooking
Comments from Councillors include · Overdevelopment · Loss of privacy · Concerns of further development · Development looks like a second storey · Could the windows be removed? · What were the recommended best practise recommendations? · There are already examples of overlooking in the area · Damaging to skyline · Contrary to Policy WE8, S1 and S2 · Roof height raising is significant · Impacts on visual amenities · Relative height is lower than the objectors’ · No policy reasons for refusal as no loss of outlook · Dominant effect on neighbouring properties · Can a condition be added for bee bricks and bat and birdboxes?
In response the Planning Officer informed the committee that: · The window is the greatest area of concern for objectors and Councillors can request its removal as a condition · Ecologist recommended best practises are about handling of bats and the building fabrics · Applicant would likely accept a condition on birdboxes, bee bricks and bat boxes. · The glazed windows in the WC can be opened · View is not a planning consideration, but outlook is
It was proposed by Councillor Haines and seconded by Councillor Dewhirst that permission be granted as set out in the officer’s report, with one additional condition relating to the ecological report.
A roll call was taken
For
Councillors Bullivant, H Cox, J Hook, Dewhirst, Nutley, Goodman Bradbury, Haines
Total: 7
Against
Councillors Bradford, Clarance, Hayes, MacGregor, Nuttall, Patch
Total: 6
Resolved
That permission be granted subject to the following conditions:
1. Development to take place within 3 years. 2. Development to be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings. 3. Undertake recommendations of the ecology report. 4. Bee bricks, bird boxes, and bat boxes to be installed |
|
20/01252/MAJ Trinity Nursery, Teignmouth PDF 665 KB Minutes: The Planning Officer advised the Committee that due to receiving a revised consultation response from Teignbridge Waste Department recommending refusal, the application should be deferred until the next committee meeting.
It was proposed by Councillor Haines and seconded by Councillor Goodman-Bradbury that the item be deferred to a future meeting.
A roll call was taken.
For
Councillors Bradford, Bullivant, H Cox, Hayes, J Hook, Dewhirst, Nuttall, Nutley, Patch, Goodman-Bradbury, and Haines.
Total: 11
Against
Councillor MacGregor
Total: 1
Resolved
That decision be deferred until the next committee meeting for the following reasons:
A revised consultation response from Teignbridge Waste was received 14/12/20 whereby their response was changed from supporting the application to objecting to the application. |
|
TPO Applications |
|
TPO E2/28/66 Doveteign, Teignmouth PDF 315 KB Minutes: The TPO Officer introduced the application to the committee with an application.
Public Speaker, Objector – Spoke on: · Trees are overgrown · Trees are too densely packed · The TPO is unsustainable · The TPO prevents installation of new accesses · A site inspection should be carried out
Comments from councillors include: · Regulations & Appeals Committee supported the application earlier in the year
It was proposed by Councillor MacGregor and seconded by Councillor Goodman-Bradbury that the TPO be approved.
A roll call was taken.
For
Councillors Bradford, H Cox, Hayes, J Hook, Dewhirst, Nuttall, Nutley, Patch, Goodman-Bradbury, and Haines.
Total: 10
Against
None
Abstained
Councillors Bullivant and Clarance
Resolved
That the TPO be approved.
|
|
Appeal Decisions - to note appeal decisions made by the Planning Inspectorate. PDF 121 KB Minutes: The Committee noted decisions made by the Planning Inspectorate. |